similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to sander-holding.de

Sander Holding alternatives & similar sites

Sander Gruppe | Food Service — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Food Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
foodsavers.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Food Savers	Austria de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ngs.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Noris Gastro Service \| Drinkport	Germany de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eis-einfalt.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Einfalt Alexander e.U. \| Tiefkühlprofi	Austria de	food-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
foodsolution.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ihr Allrounder für das komplette Food-Sortiment	Austria de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
servisa-magazin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SERVICE-BUND: Liefergroßhandel für Gastro, Hotellerie und GV - Service-Bund	Germany~ de	food-industry Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
servisamagazin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SERVICE-BUND: Liefergroßhandel für Gastro, Hotellerie und GV - Service-Bund	Germany~ de	food-industry Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
oilway.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Oilway Gastro Service - Startseite	de	food-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bellfoodgroup.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Leading in Food - Bell Food Group	de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consumcore.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	HEILIQ – Food Supply	de	food-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
contact-cooker.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	HOJA Food Tec \| Industrie-Bratanlagen	Germany~ de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360fruit.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	FLAGFOOD :: A Fruitful Cooperation	Switzerland de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
360fruits.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	FLAGFOOD :: A Fruitful Cooperation	Switzerland de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
foodcompany.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AT Food Company	Austria de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
niega.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NIEMANN GMBH Neuss Düsseldorf, Lebensmittellieferant, Foodservice, Lieferant Gastronomie, Gastroservice	Germany de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
niemann-gastro.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NIEMANN GMBH Neuss Düsseldorf, Lebensmittellieferant, Foodservice, Lieferant Gastronomie, Gastroservice	Germany de	food-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aspiria-nonfood.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Entwicklung innovativer Nonfood-Produkte \| aspiria\|nonfood	de	food-industry TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aspirianonfood.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Entwicklung innovativer Nonfood-Produkte \| aspiria\|nonfood	de	food-industry TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nita-hygiene.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	nita HYGIENE – MAKING FOOD SAFER	Germany de	food-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.