similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to samlawes.com

Samlawes alternatives & similar sites

Sam Lawes — Designer – Visual and interactive designer in Salt Lake City — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
leafyowl.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Diane(Ziyi) Jian — Interaction & Visual Designer – Designing rhythm, emotion, and interface.	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curlydesigner.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Curly Designer - UX/UI Interactive Product Designer & Product Owner	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andysimpson.design ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Andy Simpson - Visual, Interaction, and Service Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mahami.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	mahami – visual and multimedia design	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leannehoworth.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Leanne Howorth — Interactive Media Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alilausch.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ALI LAUSCH – VISUAL DESIGNER	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thejoshuadavid.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Joshua David – Visual Designer	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allison-design.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Allison Knudsen – UX Designer – New York City UX Designer	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meganbergdesigns.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Megan Berg Designs - Visual Arts and Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alicegalanodesign.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Alice Galano Design \| Creative Director & Brand Designer – Seattle	en	design Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ndnaturestudio.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	2ndNature Studio \| An Interactive Design Studio	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nmphan.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Midesigner / - Creative director & Brand designer in Paris, France :: Behance	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nogarosner.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Noga Rosner — Visual Communication Designer Portfolio	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rosebudandco.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Luxury Branding And Website Design For Interior Designers	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annastella.design ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Anna Stella Design – Art Director & Designer \| Visual & Corporate Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
capolicybuilder.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CA Designer — Conditional Access Design Workbench	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anmari.design ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Anmari Koltchev \| Visual and Product Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ma-ma.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - ma ma Interactive System Design	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.