similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to sagascience.com

Sagascience alternatives & similar sites

Centre national de la recherche scientifique | Sagascience : collection de dossiers thématiques en ligne — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
anpr.tn ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Agence Nationale de la Promotion de la Recherche scientifique	fr	science Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cerist.dz ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	CERIST (Centre de Recherche sur l'Information Scientifique et Technique ) - CERIST	fr	science Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centre-mersenne.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	centre Mersenne : revues scientifiques en libre accès	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raccoursci.info ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	RaccourSci, la communication scientifique sans détour	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raccoursci.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	RaccourSci, la communication scientifique sans détour	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raccoursci.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	RaccourSci, la communication scientifique sans détour	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afis.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Afis Science - Association française pour l information scientifique	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boluki.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Boluki.org : Revue Scientifique en Sciences Sociales et Humaines \| Boluki	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cena.institute ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Département de Mandombe, Épistémologie, Neurosciences, Innovation & Décolonisation — CENA — Centre Africain d'Excellence Scientifique & d'Innovation	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xba.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Blog de recherche \| Autour de SAT et de la programmation par contraintes	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
droledescience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Drôle de science : apprendre en s'amusant	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jardindesmaths.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ACCUEIL - Le Jardin des Mathématiques	fr	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ader-mediterranee.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ADER - Développement de l’enseignement et des recherches	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labofoudre.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Foudre	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labotechno.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Le labo de Science et Technologie	fr	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
news-brain.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Neurosciences et Mythes	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nexterra-hub.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	NEXTERRA \| Science Hub	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
celadon.blue ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - Association Celadon	fr	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.