similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to sa-research.de

Sa Research alternatives & similar sites

Shehzad Akhtar | Research & Headhunting — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jobvisite.biz ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Personalberatung & Headhunter Thüringen \| Executive Search	Germany~ de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
paltron.at ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IT Personalberatung & Headhunter \| PALTRON	Austria de	human-resources Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
tulke-consulting.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - Interim Recruiting & Headhunting \| Tulke Consulting	de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctc-istanbul.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CTC Recruiters & Headhunters - DEUTSCH	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cut-out-shop.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	lingscheid \| Personalresearch	de	human-resources Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
squadra.at ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Headhunting, Personalvermittlung & Beratung \| Squadra	Austria de	human-resources TYPO3	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
jobmatch-coaching.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jobmatch-HR - Personaldiagnostik	de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jobmatch-hr.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jobmatch-HR - Personaldiagnostik	de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainmatch-recruit.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	brainmatch.io – Personalberatung neu gedacht	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainmatch-recruiting.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	brainmatch.io – Personalberatung neu gedacht	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainmatch-team.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	brainmatch.io – Personalberatung neu gedacht	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caddie.team ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Der moderne Headhunter für jede offene Stelle \| Caddie Recruiting	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medi-con.biz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Acasa (romaneste)	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rodriguez-iconsulting.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Internationale Personalberatung für Fach- und Führungskräfte	de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
radulescu.info ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Matt Radulescu \| Headhunter für IT-Fachkräfte in Österreich	de	human-resources Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
venture-link.digital ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	VentureLink - Exzellenz im Recruiting	de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bolsinger-personal.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bolsinger Personalberatung aus München	de	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janpautsch.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Jan Pautsch – Headhunter specializing in expert search for Digital Transformation \| Global Network \| Berlin-based	de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.