similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to rudyfaile.com

Rudyfaile alternatives & similar sites

Rudy Faile: Infrastructure at scale. Career growth. Building things. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
r00ty.com ↗	97 match 1 shared topics	Rudy Faile: Infrastructure at scale. Career growth. Building things.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbxegypt.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	CBX \| Infrastructure for Scale	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gtmwithnik.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nik L — Growth Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chocksaway.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	chocksaway.com \| building software systems and infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
modeerak.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Server Sentinel \| Infrastructure monitoring that stays awake	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
9lx.app ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	9lx — Infrastructure & Projects	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cartography.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cartography - Open Source Infrastructure Mapping Tool	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mintonium.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MintoNium Your Trusted Staking Infrastructure provider	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
obsrvr.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	OBSRVR - Mining infrastructure, your way	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mobiska.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mobiska — Payments & messaging infrastructure for Africa	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
peterku.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Peter Ku - EDA Infrastructure Engineer \| Resume	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quantstratum.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	QuantStratum · Trading Infrastructure & Quantitative Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashoklabs.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ashoklabs \| Notes on DevOps, platform engineering, and building reliable infrastructure.	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
odim.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Open Distributed Infrastructure Management	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qone.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	qone.io — infrastructure // code // systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4thechain.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4TheChain - Blockchain infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4thechain.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4TheChain - Blockchain infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mkguirguis.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Michael Guirguis \| IT Director & Infrastructure Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.