similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to robert-tran.de

Robert Tran alternatives & similar sites

Robert Tran — Professional Portfolio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
pslabnet.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Professional Service - Remote LAB	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timjuestel.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Portfolio Tim Jüstel	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
r-foster.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	A tech enthusiast's playground	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raphael-goetz.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Raphael Götz — Software Engineer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elitereview.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	EliteReview.de - Expert Tech Reviews and Gadget Analysis	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
durasi.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mert Durasi — IT Project Manager & Developer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qbitflow.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	QBITFLOW - Quantum Solutions to real world problems	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qubitflow.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	QBITFLOW - Quantum Solutions to real world problems	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
e-pattern.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	epattern – personal drop space of interesting links	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quantumgalactics.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	QG \| Quantum Galactics GmbH	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
radar-sensor.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	IMST \| SENTIRE RADAR	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
op-v.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	OP-V — Stimme der Hypnagogia Welt	de	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7s-tool.sbs ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	PM — Seven Shepherds	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inclusion-tech-lab.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Teilhabe durch Technologie - Inclusion Tech Lab	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timgenieur.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	TimGenieur — Let's build something great.	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timhornig.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	TimGenieur — Let's build something great.	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dueloftheforce.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	PasteHub — Share developer output in seconds	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qgist.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	QGIST at EuroSciPy 2019 in Bilbao — the /kwa:rk/ GIST project	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.