similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to richardphung.com

Richardphung alternatives & similar sites

richardphung.com – life and times. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
4qan.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4qan.com – 4QAN.COM	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hypertunnel.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	HyperTunnel – Access experts through space and time	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
peterannabel.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Peter Annabel – Bringing everyday life and technology together.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikeleidner.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MikeLeidner.com – tech blog	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
or97.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	OR97.COM – Inspire to Invent	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ujnotes.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ujjwal Singh's notes on life and technology - Ujnotes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikeelmasry.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	mikeelmasry.com – Mike Elmasry	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tupps.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Tupps.com – Random Thoughts of Luke Tupper	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polkproject.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Polk Project – Tech News and Tips	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edgeinfotech.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	edgeinfotech.com – Personal Interest and Consulting Website	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tronixstuff.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	tronixstuff.com – fun and learning with electronics since 2010	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarondrichard.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Richard - Dispatcher and Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ehmatthes.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ehmatthes.com - code, politics, and life	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eisendrang.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Eisendrang’s Archives – Links, Notes, and Tools	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pk-movie.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AFED Timesheet Dev	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oknerd.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	OKNERD – Passion and Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ukieworld.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aofdev.com – My blog site for computer, technology, traveler and etc.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaveling.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	KAVELING.COM — Blockchain Solutions & Token Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.