similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to retrieverdata.at

Retrieverdata alternatives & similar sites

Retrieverdata - — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
datastories.at ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	datastories	Austria de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nerdathlete.de ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	nerdathlete	Germany de	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tec4data.at ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	tec4data	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ask-de.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	ASKi & Data Intelligence GmbH	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oracle-in-zen.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Oracle DBA Blog	Germany de	databases WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
statsoft.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Data Science und Analytics \| StatSoft GmbH	Germany de	databases WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minceddata.info ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Mincing Data - Gain insight from data - Mincing Data - Gain Insight from Data	de	databases Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
communidata.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Open Data for Local Communities – Open Data. Closer.	Austria de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dataintelligence.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Data Intelligence Offensive (DIO) – Netzwerk für Daten	Austria de	databases WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
23degrees.io ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Create, find and reuse interactive data visualizations - 23°	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
never-afk.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	never-afk - bitstackers blog	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
metaxdata.eu ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	metaXdata – Der Referenzserver für Metadaten zu Bildungsmedien	European Union de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ngng.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	certox GmbH \| analyze your data	Germany de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
powerofbi.at ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	workingondata \| my personal blog about everything Data Platform related, Microsoft Fabric, Data Governance, Power BI stuff and everything that's interesting	Austria de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d42m.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	d42m \| Knowledge • Information • Data	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturecloud.me ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Kulturserver - CultureBase - Kulturdatenbank	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
databinding.eu ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	databinding GmbH \| Voller Energie und Datendrang!	European Union de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aspicon.ch ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	ASPICON Database Technology and Service - Startseite	Switzerland de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.