similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to researchmesh.com

Researchmesh alternatives & similar sites

Collate — Automated Research Communications — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jaravus.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jaravus Research Notes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theundercloud.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Under Cloud \| The ultimate digital research assistant	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boterdrop.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	BOTERDROP — Automation Your Airdrop Project	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonlemauk.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jason.LeMauk - Automate to Elevate	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gammatria.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Gammatria — SYMBI research notes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
waterworkslabs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Waterworks Labs \| Applied research and product development	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcrb.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Journal of Current Research in Blockchain	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamburkeware.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Adam Burke’s Software Notes \| Notes on software and research.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssbook.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Computational Analysis of Communication	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devfue.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Devfue - Advanced Research & Experimental Code	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cspaper.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CSPaper — The Verification Layer of Research — CSPaper	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aapinyc.tech ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Origin — AAPI in tech community in NYC	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
botstack.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	BotStack — n8n Automation Templates & Workflows	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamfnation.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jamf Nation \| Community	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thetimothyjoshuamoua.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Timothy Joshua Moua — UX Researcher	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
galeyang.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Gale Yang - Product Research Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scantronmeasure.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scantron \| Data Capture & Automation Platform	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scantron.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scantron \| Data Capture & Automation Platform	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.