similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to researchkick.com

Researchkick alternatives & similar sites

ChatAcademia — Supercharge Your Research With ChatAcademia — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
chatacademia.com ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	ChatAcademia — Supercharge Your Research With ChatAcademia	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchguru.ai ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Research Guru - Academic Research Assistant	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
research-ly.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Research-ly \| AI Research Copilot for Academic Writing \| Research-ly	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchchat.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ResearchChat	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chatpaper.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ChatPaper: Explore and AI Chat with the Academic Papers	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchwith.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	researchwith.ai	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
observablecompute.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Observable Compute Foundation \| Independent AI Research	United States~ en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchtracker.app ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Research Tracker	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
checkin-ai.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CheckIn AI — Uncover Student Thinking Without the Grading Grind	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
photoninkai.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Photon Ink AI \| The Digital Senior Research Fellow	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
numbertheoryguy.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Justin Stevens – Machine Learning Researcher on AI for Education	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchpen.ai ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	researchpen.ai – Research. Simplified	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humanedgeacademy.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Human Edge Academy - Home	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nullhypothesis.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The Null Hypothesis \| The Null Hypothesis	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edblogcast.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	edblogcast.com – At the intersection of research, innovation, and responsibility.	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gudtechs.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	GUDTECHS - Improve Yourself	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
resilienceaichallenge.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The Resilience AI Challenge - Enhancing Critical Thinking	en	artificial-intelligence Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashimasitaula.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Ashima Sitaula, PhD — Learning & Development Portfolio	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.