similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to renebaving.de

Renebaving alternatives & similar sites

ReneP8 (René Baving) · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nimut.de ↗	81 match 2 shared topics	Nimut · GitHub	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nilshanff.de ↗	81 match 2 shared topics	Nils1729 · GitHub	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
norikade.de ↗	80 match 2 shared topics	NorikaDE (norikaDE) · GitHub	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nitroosit.de ↗	79 match 2 shared topics	yeahitsjan (Jan Strumpen) · GitHub	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
testing-board.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Softwaretest, Testautomatisierung, Agile Test, Crowdtesting	de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2scale.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	2scale DevOps, Agile Softwareentwicklung, Consulting // Deutschland	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3llipsis.tech ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	3llipsis – Innovation und Zukunftssicherheit	de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nilsobermann.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	20150914_Android_Web_Ver_003	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
entwicklerteamz.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Andreas Dev Solutions	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meldanor.me ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Kilian Gärtner	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ninjaneers.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Ninjaneers - Code. Collaboration. Continuity.	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nl-vertreter.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Hasbun Wood Engineering	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chronoexact.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	ChronoExact \| Lokale Uhrzeit, Weltuhr und Zeit-Tools	de	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fas-method.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Functional Architecture for Systems Method (FAS) - Functional Architectures for SystemsFunctional Architectures for Systems \| The FAS method & more	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anders.hamburg ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Homepage von Sven Anders	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meik.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Meik Minks – Proud dad, co-founder of @inoxio, software engineer, quality expert, scrum master, Ruby coder, mac user, volleyball trainer, free athlete, aikidoka, worldtrip veteran and mountain lover	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nixmuss.digital ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	… aber alles kann	de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
otaviaggi.info ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Mapp Engage - Login-Seite	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.