similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to rememberingksc.com

Rememberingksc alternatives & similar sites

Remembering KSC | History of Kentucky Southern College — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
philoviz.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	History of Philosophy - Summarized & Visualized	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaihs.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	AAIHS - African American Intellectual History Society	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nyshistoryday.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Welcome to New York State History Day! - Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kc-johnson.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	KC Johnson \| I am a professor of history at Brooklyn College, where I teach courses in 20th century U.S. politics, foreign relations, and constitutional history. Feel free to email me at kcjohnson9@gmail.com.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nyacademyofhistory.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	New York Academy of History	United States~ en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ohioacademyofhistory.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The Ohio Academy of History	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
melbournehistoryworkshop.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Melbourne History Workshop	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediahistorydivision.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The History Division \| AEJMC	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cthistorycenter.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Connecticut Center for History & Civic Learning	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cassondradhanna.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Cassondra Desiree Hanna – Writer \| PhD Student \| Historian	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reclaimingourhistories.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Reclaiming Our Histories	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melrosestories.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	(Dis)Placed Urban Histories: Melrose	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csudigitalhumanities.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Center for Public History + Digital Humanities at Cleveland State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sethtannenbaum.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Seth S. Tannenbaum, Ph.D. – American Historian and Sport Studies Professor	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quintessenceofham.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Quintessence of Ham	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
archaeolink.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	lesson plans and other reviewed resources for classes	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
serenewilliams.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	SERENE BENNETT WILLIAMS	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashiggins.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.