similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to realgar.net

Realgar alternatives & similar sites

Axel Weber – Grafisch gestaltete Requisiten — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
desireeeser.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Désirée Eser – Grafik Design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alleswirdgestaltet.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	alleswirdgestaltet \| Grafik + Design	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frischdesign.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	frischdesign – Grafikdesign, Berlin	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designtist-gestaltet.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	d e s i g n t i s t \| GESTALTET	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nadjabucovnik.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Nadja Bucovnik – Grafikdesign	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netzreiter.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Grenzfarben – Agentur für Gestaltung	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
olivermatzke.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Oliver Matzke \| net – Satz + Gestaltung	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
glaridea.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	glaridea – planung – entwicklung – gestaltung	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mahlke.one ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	mahlke.one – Grafik, webdesign aus Berlin / Brandenburg	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediengestalter.cloud ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mediengestalter Cloud	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-impuls.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-im-puls.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designimpuls.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4-dimensional.space ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	4dimensional – Printdesign & Gestaltung Schweiz	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
markusjaeger.info ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Markus Jäger Gestaltung	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
neu-gierig.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	neu.gierig - Grafikdesign - neu.gierig - büro für gestaltung	de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melaniegrob.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Feinste Gestaltung	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
n-zwo.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	N2 - Büro für Gestaltung	de	design Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.