similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to readme-framework.org

Readme Framework alternatives & similar sites

index | readME Framework — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mahmut.link ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Mahmut İsçi \| Readme	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a4word.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Techblog · Phoenix Framework	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gantry.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Gantry - Next Generation Theme Framework \| Gantry	en	web-development Grav	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frijoles524.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Index \| Frijoles524	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
frontfamily.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	FrontFamily — Convert UI Components Between Frameworks	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kickstartui.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	KickstartUI - Explore the best UI Frameworks, Libraries & Build Tools	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wifhat.app ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	My Framer Site	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annex.com.au ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Annex \| Home	Australia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctiaccessibilityverified.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CTI Accessibility Verified™ – CTI Miami ADA Framework	en	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kevin-read.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Kevin Read	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myrespitrak.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Welcome \| RespiTrak	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reindex.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Reindex	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
templui.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The UI Kit for templ - templUI	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lyokolux.space ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Index of lyokolux.space	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reimbursir.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Login \| REIMBURSIR	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dustpress.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - devgeniem/dustpress: A WordPress theme framework for writing templates with Dust.js templating engine and separate data models. · GitHub	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kennethau.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Kenneth Au \| React and Shopify Developer Brisbane	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stigmergic.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	index.md - stigmergic	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.