similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to re-design.de

Re Design alternatives & similar sites

Enrico Reinsdorf - Senior UX Designer aus Nürnberg | CPUX-F zertifiziert - Enrico Reinsdorf — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
durlej.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Christian Durlej — Senior UX/UI Designer	Germany de	design	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexanderschradt.ch ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Alexander Schradt – Senior UX Designer – Portfolio	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thierryguidicelli.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Thierry Guidicelli – UI/UX Designer based in Lucerne	de	design Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
querg.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	David Querg \| UX Designer @ make.tv	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raiko-moeller.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Raiko Moeller – Head of UX/UI Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fabiennechrist.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Fabienne Christ — Product Designer \| UI/UX	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estherblum.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Esther Blum – Freelance Senior UX/UI Designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ellenstruck.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Ellen Struck - UI/UX Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
experiencearchitect.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Tim Neumann \| UX & UI Designer, UX Strategy & Manangement \| Hamburg \| UX Master Certified (UXMC) in Hamburg	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rb-grafikdesign.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesigner Reinhard Bockhorst	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rbockhorst.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesigner Reinhard Bockhorst	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dunkelviolett.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Martin, Interface designer	Germany de	design Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomasoehrli.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Oehrli - Digital Multimedia Design aus Bern	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raabendesign.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	START • RaabenDesign	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
raminrahmati.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesigner Ostfriesland – Ramin Rahmati \| Design & Konzept	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
d-m-d.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	DMD – Daniel Markus Design – Grafik Designer \| Freelancer	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eliassiebert.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Elias Siebert, UX & Product Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erge-design.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Grafik, Konzeption & Design \| Print- und Webdesign aus Berlin \| erge-DESIGN	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.