similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to raw-science.org

Raw Science alternatives & similar sites

Energy systems, critical materials and real costs analysis — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
gunasooriya-lab.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Gunasooriya Lab \| Digital Catalysis, Materials and Interfaces Lab	en	science Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mimeticmatter.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Mimetic Matter \| Living Systems. Material Futures.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bitplane.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Scientific Cameras, Microscopy Systems, Spectrographs and Optical Cryosats - Andor - Oxford Instruments	Switzerland en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3d-icomas.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	home - 3d-ICOMAS - 3day International Conference on Materials Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iacmccm.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	2026 International Conference on Materials Physics, Chemistry, and Composite Materials (MPCCM 2026)	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designmylab.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Waldner lab solutions, STEM rooms, filling systems and process systems	United Kingdom en	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
sethjking.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Seth King — Risk & Safety Analysis	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
phychemist.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Phychemist - Advanced Materials Research Organization	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icam-online.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ICAM - International Centre for Advanced Materials	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astralsystems.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Astral Systems - Next-generation fusion systems	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chiarastefanoni.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Chiara Stefanoni \| Critical Animal Studies Scholar and Philosopher	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icafm.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ICAFM 2021 \| Advanced Functional Materials	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asticou-earth.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ASTICOU Earth Systems	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kathleenulrich.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Katie Ulrich, PhD – Cultural anthropologist studying raw materials and sustainability.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2d-nano.tech ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Emerging Nanomaterials for Electronics and Photonics Research \| Amine El Moutaouakil's Research Group	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
photonicscience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Scientific Imaging \| Imaging Cameras and Systems \| Camera Technology	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icamr.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The 17th ICAMR-Advanced Materials Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3sresearch.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group \| 3S RESEARCH – CRITICALLY CONSTRUCTIVE	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.