similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to rasmusolsson.dev

Rasmusolsson alternatives & similar sites

Rasmus Olsson — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
theutcloudarchitect.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Nicholas Rasmussen – Cloud Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakubstransky.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	All about software development \| All about software development. Covers Infrastructure, DevOps, Security and cloud infrastructure.	en	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simple-task.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - Simple Task LLC	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bosstrek.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - Bosstrek	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesarmes.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	James Armes \| Solutions Engineer @ Code for America. Developing technical solutions to problems that affect real people.	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digvijay.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Digvijay Padhiyar \| Full-Stack Software Engineer & Tech Enthusiast	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bolet.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	bolet.io — practical writing on cloud, infra & software craft	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mategelei.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Mate Gelei-Szego \| Experienced DevOps engineer and cloud architect with a background in software development, finance and service management. Writing on infrastructure, automation, AI, people, or whatever grinds my gears.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mebster.me ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Mebster	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sirchia.cloud ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Robert Sirchia	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasontaylor.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jason Taylor — Software Architecture & .NET	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jbossforge.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Red Hat - We make open source technologies for the enterprise	en	cloud-computing Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sathyasays.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Sathyajith Bhat on AWS & DevOps	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adam.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Adam wuz here	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adilrmallick.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Adil R. Mallick - Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
martenova.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	MARTENOVA — Enterprise IT Engineering	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scalenextlinklabs.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	NextLink Labs \| Innovate. Build. Scale.	en	cloud-computing HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rycerz.co ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home • Dawid Rycerz	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.