similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to rascal-mpl.org

Rascal Mpl alternatives & similar sites

The Rascal Meta Programming Language | The Rascal Meta Programming Language — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
langindex.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	LangIndex — source-backed programming language reference	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-lang.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	The Crystal Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
langfor.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Learn programming languages by comparison \| langfor.dev	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
languagelineage.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Programming Language Lineage Graph \| What Languages Are Written In	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
langurlang.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	langur programming language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sqbra.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	SquareBracket Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
core-lang.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Core Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chapel-lang.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Chapel Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambda-the-ultimate.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Lambda the Ultimate \| Programming Languages Weblog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spotthebug.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Spot the Bug - Daily programming challenges	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccofie.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AnthonyTheOracle blog – The best stuff in R programming	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adaic.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ada Resource Association - News and resource for the Ada programming language	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambda-the-penultimate.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Not A Number - Programming, Theory, and Math	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
languagechart.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Language Chart	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
languagechart.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Language Chart	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
languagechart.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Language Chart	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xeb.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Shortjump! \| Reversing engineering, programming and what not…	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
impostorprogrammer.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Impostor Programmer \| Impostor Syndrome as a Programmer, real or …	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.