similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to raphaelscholl.org

Raphaelscholl alternatives & similar sites

Raphael Scholl – Philosopher and historian of science — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
raphaelscholl.com ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Raphael Scholl – Philosopher and historian of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katemaccord.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Kate MacCord – Historian and philosopher of science @ ASU	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hssa-journal.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	History of Science in South Asia	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 14
hypertheory.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Hyper Theory – Blog, Podcast, and Live Events. Science, Philosophy, Art, and more.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philofsci.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Philosophy of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdonnellinitiativeatmbl.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	McDonnell Initiative @MBL – Transforming discovery through collaborations among historians, philosophers, and life scientists	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hssmeeting.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	HSS 2020 - History of Science Society	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyrilleimbert.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cyrille Imbert – Senior Researcher (CNRS) in philosophy of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philoneuro.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Philosophy & Neuroscience \| getting lost in science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philosophyasscience.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Philosophy as Science \| The School of Brentano and the Rise of Scientific Philosophy	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guardsci.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to the Guardian of Science®!	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elayshech.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Elay Shech \| Philosophy of Science & Physics, AI Ethics & Machine Learning	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashavrova.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Anastasia Shavrova – <em>Bridging Accessibility and Science</em>	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shaerscience.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Shaer Science	en	science Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curatescience.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Curate Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iaosm.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND MATH	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineschmitt.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Catherine Schmitt – science writer	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
misciencecenter.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Michigan Science Center \| Putting YOU at the center of Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.