similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to ramshankar.org

Ramshankar alternatives & similar sites

Ramshankar — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
spinside.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sebastien's Blog ·	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beaurivage.io ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Justin Beaurivage's Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
gianlucaveschi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gianluca Veschi	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benmanns.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Benjamin Manns Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theaustinwilcox.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Austin Wilcox	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
naxxfish.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	naxxfish	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
ganeshshanker.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Personal Blog - Ganesh Shanker K K	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nn0y.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NN0Y hamshack online	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamburkeware.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adam Burke’s Software Notes \| Notes on software and research.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adityamandal.tech ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aditya Mandal \| Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquitty.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	McQuitty – Thoughts on being a system engineer (SE) and software	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mboyle.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Latest Posts – Matt Boyle	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamdavidson.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adam Davidson	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adwait.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adwait Bokade	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keeganbruer.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Keegan Bruer \| System Architect & Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
francisalcos.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Francis Alcos \| Software Engineer & Endurance Athlete	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dctechnews.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	DCTechNews	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
warehack.ing ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	warehack.ing — Open Source Hardware & Software	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.