similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to railstutorial.ru

Railstutorial alternatives & similar sites

Перевод Ruby on Rails Tutorial: Изучение Rails на Примерах | Ruby on Rails 3 Tutorial book and screencasts | by Michael Hartl — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Development →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
legan.by ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	LEGAN — Home Website	Belarus ru	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
web-studio-51.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Ефремов.код	ru	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisbalyko.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	denisbalyko.com \| Денис Балыко	ru	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mean-dev.info ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Блог MEAN stack разработчика	ru	web-development Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikhailbbk.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Михаил Бабков \| Python Developer	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdwit.dev ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Евгений Федоряченко — Senior Backend Developer · mdwit	Russia~ ru	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skullkon.tech ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Юра Саргсян \| Senior Go / Backend Developer	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deos-dev.com ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Aleksandr Vinogradov \| deos	ru	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
di4.dev ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	DI4.DEV — Дикая разработка. Прирученный результат.	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adena.kz ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Разработка сайтов и магазинов на Битрикс. Внедрение CRM Битрикс 24 в Казахстане	ru	web-development Bitrix	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
webkiev.com ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Разработка сайтов на чистом коде и на легких скриптах. \| Оптимизация бизнеса	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advs.tech ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	ООО Передовые Решения	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ibig.by ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Создание сайтов на diafan \| Программист Богданов Илья	Belarus ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jetru.by ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	AI-Native Ruby on Rails - Custom Software Development Company JetRuby Agency	Belarus ru	web-development WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doxload.net ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	DoxloaD. Интеграция 1С-Битрикс	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medialab.su ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Создание, поддержка и продвижение сайтов — Medialab	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
boreesych.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Евгений Бартенев \| мок-интервью Junior Python \| обучение разработке \| записи интервью	ru	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jdplex.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	JDPlex — разработка, поддержка и сопровождение веб, VR/AR, мобильных приложений	ru	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.