similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to railstutorial.org

Railstutorial alternatives & similar sites

Ruby on Rails Tutorial | Learn Enough to Be Dangerous — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Development →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
vledin.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Ruby on Rails 7.0.4	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100jsprojects.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	100+ JavaScript Projects \| Learn Web Development	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bezkoder.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	BezKoder - Mobile & Web App Development Tutorials	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shteflyuk.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Dmytro Shteflyuk's Home - Ruby on Rails, MySQL, Scalability & Performance	en	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1keydata.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	1Keydata - Free Online Programming Tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laravelclick.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Collection of Latest Laravel Tips and Tutorials for Beginners	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shotdev.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Free Online Web Tutorial Programming and Example Scripts.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3hourseveryday.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	3 Hours Everyday — Learn, Build, and Grow Consistently	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
launchfree.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	LaunchFree.net: Learn & Create - Use browser apps & explore the code.	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mkipp.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Matthew Kipp \| Software Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3manuel.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	3manuel \| Full Stack & C/C++ Developer (Linux, WebAssembly)	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mdarwish.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Mohammad Darwish – Software Engineer (Java, Backend)	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
himanshuaggarwal.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Himanshu Aggarwal \| Software Engineering Student	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apache-asp.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Apache::ASP	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devhaseeb.tech ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	M. Haseeb Amjad - Full-Stack Developer Portfolio	PK~ en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
vitikainenonni.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Onni Vitikainen \| Full Stack Developer Portfolio	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hermanceaser.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Herman Ceaser - Full Stack Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdhasan.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Hasan Developer \| Md Hasan Developer \| HasanDeveloper \| mdhasan.dev \| Hasan - MERN Stack Developer \| Full Stack JavaScript Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.