similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to racu.dev

Racu alternatives & similar sites

Mihai Racu - Engineering Manager | Mihai Racu — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jasoncooper.dev ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Jason Cooper - Engineering Manager & Full-Stack Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
diegocosta.me ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Diego Costa - Engineering Manager, Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahmetkayar.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Ahmet Kayar \| Software Engineer & Engineering Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
devamthegeek.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Devam Narkar - Engineering Leader & Software Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7pm.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tombenner.co ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Tom Benner \| Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamescoggan.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	James Coggan — Senior Android Engineer & Engineering Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4thoctet.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	4th Octet -- Engineering-led managed services	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boringengineer.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Boring Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
thetodorov.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Constantine - Engineering Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
memeticengineering.ai ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Memetic Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakubpradeniak.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jakub Pradeniak - Engineering Notes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jamesrarthur.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	James R. Arthur \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marjilabs.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Marji Labs - Platform Engineering & SRE Consulting	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
outpostqa.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	OutpostQA \| Managed QA Services For Engineering Teams	Mexico~ en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamklockars.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Adam Oscar Klockars — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adriansnelling.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Adrian Snelling \| Sr Frontend Developer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 5
aetherial.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Aetherial \| Engineering the Sublime	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.