similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to quentinread.com

Quentinread alternatives & similar sites

Quentin D. Read - Quentin D. Read — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cursorytalk.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Cursory Talk – Spreading the word – Expert reviews of scientific articles accessible for all	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
10insightsclimate.science ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Essential research findings to support decision-making in a critical decade - 10insightsclimate	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakecasselman.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Jake W. Casselman — Climate Scientist, Founder, Writer	en	science	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marvelclimate.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Kate Marvel	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikrocap.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Mikrocap – The Greenhouse Gas Effect	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
overviewsymposium.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	OVERVIEW SYMPOSIUM 2024 - Exploring the transformative potential of the planetary perspective for social responsibility	en	environment Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
co2science.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	CO2 Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobpetersenperlman.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Jacob Petersen-Perlman	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ourradioactiveocean.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Our Radioactive Ocean	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scienceimaginarium.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Imaginarium for Science, Data & Co-Design	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewildiceberg.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Wild Iceberg \| Wildlife, Nature, Climate and Earth Science Stories	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
thewildiceburg.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Wild Iceberg \| Wildlife, Nature, Climate and Earth Science Stories	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
millenniumculmination.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Millennium Culmination - millenniumculmination.net	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scenarios-project.eu ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Project - Scenarios	European Union en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
citizenscience.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	AAPS - Association for Advancing Participatory Sciences	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaydeeedwards.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Jaydee – Environmental Geochemist	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scienceshaina.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Shaina Sadai - Home	en	environment Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meerwissen.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Meerwissen: African-German Partners for Ocean Knowledge	Germany~ en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.