similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to quase.org

Quase alternatives & similar sites

Quase Quality Assurance in Scientific Evidence – Qualitätssicherung in wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Wissenschaftliche Integrität	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
noesis-online.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	noesis – Wir machen neueste Erkenntnisse der Wissenschaften für unsere Kunden nutzbar \| noesis	Germany de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nipsu.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	DG-Transkription - wissenschaftlicher Schreibservice	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
seraphic-flower.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Seraphische Forschung \| Erleben Sie wissenschaftliche Fakten – klar, spannend und fundiert präsentiert.	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystalline-curriculum.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	WissensWelt Kiel – Entdecke spannende Fakten über Wissenschaft und Technologie in Kiel	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netzwerk-nachhaltige-wissenschaft.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Netzwerk Nachhaltige Wissenschaft	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wissenschaftskommunikation.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Wissenschaftskommunikation.de – Ein Portal für all diejenigen, die Wissenschaft kommunizieren.	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wissenschaft-im-dialog.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Wissenschaft im Dialog	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scinexx.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	scinexx \| Wissensmagazin mit News aus Wissenschaft und Forschung	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christiner.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Markus Christiner - Wissenschaftsprojekte	Austria de	science Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nightofscience.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Night of Science – 12.06.2026	Germany de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
peterseeberger.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SEEBERGER.SCIENCE – Home	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nela-forscht.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Bilderbücher - Nela forscht - Naturwissenschaft für Kinder	Germany de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weltderwunder.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Welt der Wunder – nicht glauben, sondern wissen	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mintlabs.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	MINT:labs Science City Itzling	Austria de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schweizerbart.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home — Schweizerbart science publishers	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
twisty-pioneer.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	WissensWunder München – Entdecke faszinierende Fakten aus Kosmos, Technik und Biowelt	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextscientistsforfuture.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Next Scientists for Future	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.