similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to quadlab.dk

Quadlab alternatives & similar sites

Quadlab – University of Copenhagen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
illvid.dk ↗	55 match shared topic	Illustreret Videnskab - gå på opdagelse i videnskabens verden \| illvid.dk	Denmark da	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 17
ucar.edu ↗	70 match shared topic	University Corporation for Atmospheric Research \| University Corporation for Atmospheric Research	en	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jhuapl.edu ↗	70 match shared topic	Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory	en	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lawrencehallofscience.org ↗	70 match shared topic	The Lawrence Hall of Science – The public science center of the University of California, Berkeley.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
videnskab.dk ↗	18 match shared topic	Nyheder om forskning og videnskab	Denmark da	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 3
arxiv.org ↗	55 match shared topic	arXiv.org e-Print archive	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zenodo.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Zenodo	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cnrs.fr ↗	55 match shared topic	Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS)	France fr	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
openreview.net ↗	55 match shared topic	Venues \| OpenReview	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cas.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	中国科学院	China zh	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newscientist.com ↗	55 match shared topic	New Scientist \| Science news, articles, and features	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cae.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	中国工程院	China zh	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livescience.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Live Science \| Latest science news and articles for those with curious minds	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cea.fr ↗	55 match shared topic	Recherche et innovation - Le CEA, acteur majeur de la recherche au service de l'Etat, de l'économie et des citoyens.	France fr	science SharePoint	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csiro.au ↗	55 match shared topic	Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australian Government - CSIRO	Australia en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
copernicus.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Copernicus.org - About us	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchr.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Researchr		science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalacademies.org ↗	55 match shared topic	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.