similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to qrlab.de

Qrlab alternatives & similar sites

... — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cryptosprechstunde.org ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	csb	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2b-aware.online ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	2b-aware – Das Mail-basierte Cybersicherheits-Training	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
achhammer.consulting ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Marco Achhammer – IT Security Consulting	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
act.wien ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	CONCLUSION – Fazit / Schlussfolgerung	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medizinprodukte.training ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Start - Beauftragte für Medizinproduktesicherheit	de	information-and-network-security Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
memyc.org ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Privacy Security Europe – Neuer Weg	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sr7n.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	SR7N GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ssl-zertifikator.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	SSL Zertifikator - Zertifikate in nur 10 Minuten	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
praediktive-analytik.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	PRÄDIKTIVE ANALYTIK	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prangedatenschutz.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Prange Gruppe \| Familiengeführte Unternehmensgruppe	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
praetors.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Praetors	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pq-vpn.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	QuaSiModO	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
poru-wims.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	WIMS – Wach-Informations-Monitor-System	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
praxis-waechter.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Praxis-Wächter - die Firewall für den Arzt - Linogate GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prettig.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Philipp Rettig	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
priomni.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	priomni AG – Ihr Spezialist für IT-Sicherheit	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
privacyowl.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Home	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prisec.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	PriSec: Home	Germany de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.