similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to qeston.org

Qeston alternatives & similar sites

emilkrebs (Emil Krebs) · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
giovannistrasser.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	romm27 (Gio) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eugeniovazquez.com.ar ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	lugezz (Eugenio) · GitHub	Argentina en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ml-m.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	LeonMangler (Leon Mangler) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
githubris.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	KishCom (Andy Kish) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1nikolas.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	1nikolas (Nikolas Spiridakis) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naviqore.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	naviqore · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
energyreach.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Energy Reach · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bellevuegis.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	wagisdev (John Spence) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fritzthomas.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	thomasfr (Thomas Fritz) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beduncs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	beduncs (Ben) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melissaslawsky.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	mslawsky (Melissa Slawsky) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beefsack.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	beefsack (Michael Alexander) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bekiratas.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	atasbekir (Bekir Ataş) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aljoschakrettek.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	aljoscha (Aljoscha Krettek) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giraud.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	aethys256 (Quentin Giraud) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mjl.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	matthewjl (Matt Lewis) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mlu.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	nihilor (Mark Lubkowitz) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ender13120.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ender13120 · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.