similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to qedcon.org

Qedcon alternatives & similar sites

QED | 14 years of science, reason, and critical thinking — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
qrios.tech ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	qrios — fresh science, real time	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thejumboscientist.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Jumbo Scientist – The crazy and fun world of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tushyamehta.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Neuroscience, Art, and Innovation	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4loveandscience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4Love and Science - 4Love+Science	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labstello.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Labstello — Practical Science, Beautifully Simple	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rjstonline.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Research Journal of Science and Technology	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jdssv.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Journal of Data Science, Statistics, and Visualisation	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bacchusinstituteof.science ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bacchus Institute of Science	en	science Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcfns.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS)	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdsci.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Maryland Science Center	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janeuro.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Journal of Analytical Neuroscience	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcsrr.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Journal of Current Science and Research Review	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
123science.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	123 Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainmogul.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Tournament of Science Assembly! \| K-6 School Show	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquillaninstitute.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The McQuillan Institute - Science, Technology, and the Human Future	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
3sresearch.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group \| 3S RESEARCH – CRITICALLY CONSTRUCTIVE	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pwvas.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.