similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to qbcriticalthought.com

Qbcriticalthought alternatives & similar sites

Question-Based Critical Thinking — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
qbcriticalthinking.com ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Question-Based Critical Thinking	en	education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
criticalthinking.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Foundation for Critical Thinking	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctlessons.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Computational Thinking Lessons	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
questioning.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Question Mark	United States~ en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
questionengineering.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Question Engineering	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medienbildung.team ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Working Group on Educational Theory and Practices of Critical Computational Literacy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casp-uk.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
themissingquestion.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| The Missing Question	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
braino.blog ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Braino.blog - Smart Thinking, Simplified	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
questionablepedagogy.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Questionable Pedagogy	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
questionfakegrass.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Question Fake Grass in LGUSD	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bravequestions.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Brave Questions \| Teofil Lucaci \| Substack	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ans.wiki ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	AnsWiki \| Questions/Answer Wiki	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
95percentgroup.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Evidence-Based Literacy Solutions \| 95 Percent Group	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medialiteracyafrica.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Media Literacy Development Foundation – Nurturing critical media consumers and creators	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clscholarship.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Critical Language Scholarship Program	United States~ en	education Craft CMS	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acadeadmia.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	acaDEADmia - RIP Free Thinking and Challenge of Ideas	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
questparents.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	QUEST	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.