similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to qbart.dev

Qbart alternatives & similar sites

Bartłomiej Wójtowicz — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mcotner.online ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mark Cotner - Personal Homepage · Mark Cotner	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
steveshepard.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Within Reason	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisyurchak.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Denis Yurchak - Engineer&Founder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kennykeni.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kenny's Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
milchuck.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Labs @ Milchuck.com	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stevestarck.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Things I've Learned	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinemery.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Emery \| Software engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
kevinlestarge.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kev's Blog – Kevin's thoughts on software engineering, team culture, and all the things.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cubthinktank.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cub Think Tank	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
georgii.tech ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Georgii Kharlampiiev — Notes on engineering, craft & life	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
889993531.xyz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tech Insights Blog: Latest Trends in Software Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dennisfink.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Still Thinking About It — dennisfink.me	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ajhenry.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Andrew Henry (@ajhenry) - Full Stack Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mayank.foo ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mayank Chauhan - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dennispham.me ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home • Dennis Pham	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wilsonchenn.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Wilson Chen	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derekbartlett.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Derek Bartlett	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akceptor.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Akceptor - All About Everything	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.