similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to qastar.app

Qastar alternatives & similar sites

Qastar — The Social Journal — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Social Networking →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
getgolow.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Go Low — The Social Home for Golf	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
teetalkapp.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	TeeTalk — The social home for your golf game	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dxed.app ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	DXED — The Social Platform for Gamers	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wavrco.app ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	WAVR — The Social Layer for Real Life	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spotcommunity.app ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Spot — The Live Social Map for Your City	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allegro.run ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Allegro — The social hub for runners	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
socialexperiment.app ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	The Social Experiment	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weconcur.xyz ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	KuhnKur — The Social Calendar for Friend Groups	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whereu.fun ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	WhereU — the social map of your city	en	social-networking	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whiskr.lol ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Whiskr — the pet-only social network	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
letus.social ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	letus.social — The agent-native social network	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dyve.app ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DYVE — The social layer for real-world culture. 🪩	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dyve.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DYVE — The social layer for real-world culture. 🪩	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luno.social ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Luno - The Social Economy	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
letssling.live ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sling \| The Social Layer of DeFi	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptok.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CrypTok™ — The Future of Social Media	en	social-networking	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
socialopinion.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Social Opinion	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
densocial.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	den — a smaller social	en	social-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.