similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to q-know.org

Q Know alternatives & similar sites

Projekt Q-KNOW T-PATHS | Q-KNOW — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
laboratorygasgenerators.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	NTS GAS GENERATOR	de	science Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raetselfuchs.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	1005 Rätsel & Quizfragen \| Rätselfuchs \| Lass dein Hirn rauchen	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rebernik.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	PHAROS International - Bureau for Cultural & Scientific Projects	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
braincity.berlin ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Wissenschaft im Herzen Europas \| Brain City Berlin	de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caets2026.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CAETS 2026 – Sept 14–17 \| Munich	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angst.science ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Verstand	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcflown.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	F. Wetzel - Homepage	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meet-droplets.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	droplets – information for the droplets conferences	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikroskope.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	BRESSER Mikroskope & Zubehör für Labor & Schule	Germany~ de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quase.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Quase Quality Assurance in Scientific Evidence – Qualitätssicherung in wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quaternary-science.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Deutsche Quartärvereinigung - Deutsche Quartärvereinigung e.V.	de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raas-institute.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	About Us	de	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ragastrahltechnik.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Raga Strahltechnik	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
versuchmachtklug.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Liebe pädagogische Fachkräfte! - klugerversuch2	de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
panoptima.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	PANoptima Home	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pccl.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	PCCL: Polymer Competence Center Leoben	Austria de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pintofscience.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Pint of Science Austria	Austria de	science SilverStripe	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polarresearch.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	APRI - Austrian Polar Research Institute	Austria de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.