similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to pytescience.com

Pytescience alternatives & similar sites

Pyte science – Divulgação Científica — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
trelicaciencia.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Treliça - Produção e Divulgação Científica	pt	science WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
igvec.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IGVEC - Instituto Gilson Volpato de Educação Científica	pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
csrv21.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Contemporary Science Review21	pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
premiumhandbook.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Premium Handbook of Science and Technology	pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buscadoracademico.com.br ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Buscador Acadêmico \| Pesquisa de Artigos Científicos em Português	Brazil pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
anglotechcientifica.com.br ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Anglo Tech Cientifica – Assistência Técnica em equipamentos científicos – Assistência Técnica em equipamentos científicos	Brazil pt	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
casadaciencia.com.br ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Casa da Ciência – Ciência e Educação	Brazil pt	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
calibracaorgd.com.br ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Calibração RGD Instrumentos	Brazil pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cienciasecognicao.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Ciências e Cognição – Integrando mente, cérebro e educação	pt	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brasilinovacao.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	LIP - laboratório de Inovação e Pesquisa \| Inteligência de Dados	pt	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brasilinovacao.com.br ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	LIP - laboratório de Inovação e Pesquisa \| Inteligência de Dados	Brazil pt	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bancadasparalaboratorios.com.br ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	IBRAM – Móveis e Serviços para Laboratórios	Brazil pt	science Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
capelasparalaboratorio.com.br ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	IBRAM – Móveis e Serviços para Laboratórios	Brazil pt	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deboramedeiros.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Débora Medeiros – Researcher with emphasis on numerical analysis	pt	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kalynkacruz.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Kalynka Cruz	pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elmi-tec.com.br ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Elmi Tec Assistencia Tecnica e Representacao e comercio S/C Ltda.	Brazil pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
endstartec.com.br ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Assesoria Técnica e Inspeções - STARTEC	Brazil pt	science Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
engenhariadahumanidade.com.br ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Engenharia da Humanidade Site 2026	Brazil pt	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.