similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to pypackages.com

Pypackages alternatives & similar sites

Publishing Python Packages: Test, share, and automate your projects | Dane Hillard — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
package-publishing.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dual ESM/CJS Package Publishing & TypeScript	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
langpy.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	LangPy - Python Localization and Educational Transpiler	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
code-projects.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Download Free Open Source Projects \| PHP, C++ \| Source code & Projects	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs1synergy.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CS1 Synergy \| NSF Research Project	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1riz.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Projects \| 1riz	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xcoders.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	0xCoders: Level up your programming skills	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csestack.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CSEstack – Computer Science & Programming Portal	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharpbyexamples.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	C# by Examples - Simple Code Snippets	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algtrax.app ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Algtrax - Learn, Code, and Visualize Algorithms	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilearn.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Agilearn — Self-directed Python guides	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devtutorials.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	DevTutorials - Learn Programming with Hands-on Tutorials \| DevTutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdst.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	This Is Modest — Tools and projects by Modest Industries	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dddpython.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Pragmatic DDD with Python	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbrindustrial.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Tasso Z. — Python Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lankydan.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	All posts \| Lanky Dan Blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p3rl.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	p3rl.org — shorten your Perl and CPAN URLs	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambda-the-penultimate.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Not A Number - Programming, Theory, and Math	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hertechcorner.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Her Tech Corner	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.