similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to pxles.net

Pxles alternatives & similar sites

Home - Chris Kasten — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Computer Animation →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jkid.co ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jkid==Motion Design	Colombia de	computer-animation WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pixcube.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Animation Studio Schweiz \| Motion Stories - Pixcube Animation Studio	Austria de	computer-animation Contao	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
tsaworks.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	WORK - STUDIO.TS	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romanmagin.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Roman Magin – Illustration – 2D Animation – Grafik-Design	Austria de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2agenten.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Illustration - 2agenten	de	computer-animation Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreas-geier.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Andreas Geier • Grafik / Motion Design → Archiv	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bircken.design ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Laura Bircken - Motiondesign Portfolio	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ubereck.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Uber Eck	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
haarmeier-doku.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Technische Animation	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
niklaushofer.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Uber Eck	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jaschajascha.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Jascha Portfolio	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creaturepark.de ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Creature Park \| Motiondesign & Illustration	Germany de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bramowli.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Lina Bramowski – Lina Bramowski	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
therustyrobots.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Home - PHIEW!	de	computer-animation WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bounty.studio ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Home \| bounty.studio	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jens-wisser.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Home	de	computer-animation	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hafenlola.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Home	de	3-d-graphics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thelightworks.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	The Light Works - Digital Imagery	de	3-d-graphics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.