similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to publicpoweredpolicy.com

Publicpoweredpolicy alternatives & similar sites

Your voice matters. | Public Powered Policy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Politics →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
alliance-exchange.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alliance for International Exchange \| The Collective Public Policy Voice of the Exchange Community	United States~ en	politics Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanterresearch.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Genevieve Kanter, PhD – Associate Professor of Public Policy	en	politics Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
americanprinciplesproject.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	American Principles Project — Putting Families First in Public Policy	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcrwpac.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	McLennan County Republican Women - Make Your Voice Heard	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forgingyourvoice.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HOME \| Forging Your Voice	en	politics Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ialobby.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Public Policy and Grassroots Advocacy \| Advocacy Cooperative	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
opencaucus.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Staked Voice — Private input. Public truth.	Switzerland en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mynextvote.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MyNextVote — Your Voice. Your Vote.	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturetranslators.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Public Squared	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
legalnoticedatabase.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Public Notice \| amNewYork	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbpublicaffairs.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MB Public Affairs of Sacramento - Campaign, Public Policy and Governmental Experience	United States~ en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cps.org.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Centre for Policy Studies	United Kingdom en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bricktoss.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BrickToss - Let Your Voice Be Heard - Home	en	politics Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a4publicsafety.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Americans for Public Safety	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debategrader.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DebateGrader — Score policy debates on a published rubric	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
iancfriedman.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	IAN C. FRIEDMAN – WORDS MATTER	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
millennialdc.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Millennial Strategy Group \| Public Affairs & Communications	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kansaspolicyinstitute.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kansas Policy Institute	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.