similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ptcog.com

Ptcog alternatives & similar sites

Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) and Particles Newsletter. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
livescience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Live Science \| Latest science news and articles for those with curious minds	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 5
vsparticle.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	VSPARTICLE B.V.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appliednanoparticles.eu ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Applied Nanoparticles	European Union en	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cost.eu ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	COST \| European Cooperation in Science and Technology	European Union en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catalis-p.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	株式会社Catalis Partners Group	en	science	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
liveforlives.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Live for Lives Group	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccylab.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Chunchun Ye, The Ye Group at Nanyang Technological University (NTU)	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
liubaolei.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Computational Optics Imaging and Sensing Group	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eucelac-platform.eu ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	EU-CELAC \| Group of interest	European Union en	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3drosetta.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Rosetta Universe® Media Centre: Videos, Articles, & Images	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livingenergyos.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	LEOS - Living Energy Operating System	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skawigroup.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Kawi Research Group - NUS Catalysis Lab	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intraindividual.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Intraindividual – Quantitative Modeling of Repeated Observations from Individuals & Groups	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mosaicteam.eu ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	MOSAIC Team – Multidisciplinary Research Group at the University of Limerick	European Union en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2d-nano.tech ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Emerging Nanomaterials for Electronics and Photonics Research \| Amine El Moutaouakil's Research Group	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
bioinitiative.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doronkam.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Doron Kam’s research group	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.