similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to prowebdb.com

Prowebdb alternatives & similar sites

ProWebDB | Die sichere webbasierte Datenbank für Forschung, Medizin, Umfragen und Register (eCRF) — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Databases →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
vvt-easy.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Die Datenbank für Ihr Verzeichnis der Verarbeitungstätigkeiten	de	databases Bitrix	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vvteasy.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Die Datenbank für Ihr Verzeichnis der Verarbeitungstätigkeiten	de	databases Bitrix	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
catal0g.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Catal0g, die offene Datenbank -	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lorivaxonume.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lorivaxonume - Anwendungslogik und klare Datenbankmodelle für Ihren Arbeitsalltag	Germany~ de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
i40-readiness-check.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ECLASS Datenstandard für Waren und Dienstleistungen	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iwcon.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ECLASS Datenstandard für Waren und Dienstleistungen	Germany de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nelovarexil.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Nelovarexil - Logischen Code und Datenbank-Logik gemeinsam meistern	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
erp-systems.biz ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	R:SOFT Datenbank- und PPS-Systeme, RBASE, R:BASE	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ichspende.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Datenbanken und Anwendungsentwicklung	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eunity.info ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Datenbanken und Anwendungsentwicklung	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4memory.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	4Memory / Nationale Forschungsdaten Infrastruktur (NFDI)	Germany de	databases TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
access-welt.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Access Datenbank-Programmierungen	Germany de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
access-garhammer.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Microsoft Access Datenbank Programmierer - Garhammer	Germany de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bild-video-ton.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Schweizerisches Sozialarchiv: Datenbank Bild + Ton	Switzerland de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bisnode-firmendatenbank.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	D&B Firmendatenbank	Switzerland de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jhws-net.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Joachim Scholz - Datenbankkonzepte	Germany de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
access-4u.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Fertige Microsoft Access Datenbanken / ACCESS-4U Shop	Germany de	databases WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cultos.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CULTOS - Multimediales Wissensmanagement - Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.