similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to proof-keys.studio

Proof Keys alternatives & similar sites

Proof Keys Studio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
medynski.ovh ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Nerdoza Studio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voidproof.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Voidproof	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
monsevo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Monsevo \| Cyber R&D Studio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexaproof.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	hexaproof - Web3 Audits	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vlesskey.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Available keys for Vless VPN	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
outlineaccess.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tunnel Hub — Access keys for VPN	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
outlineaccess.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tunnel Hub — Access keys for VPN	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xbruno.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	bruno hacks stuff	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alcides.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	alcidesaraujo (Alcides Araújo) \| Keybase	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcptrust.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MCPTrust — Lockfile for MCP servers	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
connectprotect-kh.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Managed SIEM & SOC – ConnectProtect	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
connectprotect-ph.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Managed SIEM & SOC – ConnectProtect	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
connectprotect-sa.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Managed SIEM & SOC – ConnectProtect	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
connectprotect-uk.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Managed SIEM & SOC – ConnectProtect	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
connectprotect.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Managed SIEM & SOC – ConnectProtect	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cryptoworkshop.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Bouncy Castle API Support \| Keyfactor	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptoworkshop.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Bouncy Castle API Support \| Keyfactor	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
essproof.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ESSPROOF \| The Essence of Registry	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.