similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to projectorfriday.com

Projectorfriday alternatives & similar sites

Not So Aam Kahaniya with Kurush Dalal - Projector Friday — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
leebaileyauthor.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lee Bailey – Author – Connect with Lee on his current and future writing projects.	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8weekauthor.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	8 Week Author writing program with Suzanne Doyle-Ingram	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8space.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Project	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaakprojects.com.au ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AAAK Projects	Australia en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fiveninewide.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Joshua E. Smith, Author – A site to promote my writing and art projects.	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineproject.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Catherine Project	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
siobhainbunni.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Siobhain Bunni - Author & Project Manager	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearsomeoneproject.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dear Someone Project \| stories	en	books-and-literature Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kafka.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Kafka Project \| Home	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cervantespublicproject.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Cervantes Public Project	en	books-and-literature Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ztlinville.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Zachary Tyler Linville — Author · Educator · Project Management	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5wisdomsproject.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Five Wisdoms Project	en	books-and-literature Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charlespearce.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Charles Pearce Project	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kazakhrepresent.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	about_project	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chicagowritershouse.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Chicago Writers House Project	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mymemoirproject.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	My Memoir Project – Preserve What Should Not Be Forgotten	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jvwhittenburg.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Connecting with readers and other friends	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mybytenest.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MyByteNest — Book Summaries, Novel Analyses & Hardware Projects	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.