similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to progressivediplomacy.com

Progressivediplomacy alternatives & similar sites

Thoralf Stenvold — Progressive Diplomacy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Political Issues And Policy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
norway.no ↗	28 match shared topic	The Norway Portal - Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs	Norway no	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stortinget.no ↗	28 match shared topic	Forsiden - stortinget.no - stortinget.no	Norway no	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
sametinget.no ↗	28 match shared topic	Sametinget	Norway no	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arbeiderpartiet.no ↗	28 match shared topic	Arbeiderpartiet	Norway no	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
imdi.no ↗	28 match shared topic	Forside \| IMDi	Norway no	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vestfoldfylke.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Startsiden - Vestfold fylkeskommune	Norway no	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wenming.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	中国文明网_文明让生活更美好！	China zh	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
president.ir ↗	55 match shared topic	پایگاه اطلاع رسانی ریاست‌جمهوری اسلامی ایران	fa	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
taiwan.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	中国台湾网	China zh	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brownstone.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Brownstone Institute ⋆ Economics, Human Rights, Public Health	en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ynet.com ↗	55 match shared topic	首页_YNET.com北青新媒体	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rmlt.com.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	人民论坛网_中央重点理论网站_人民日报社主管	China zh	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chinafxj.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	中国反邪教网_中国反邪教网	China zh	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iph.kz ↗	55 match shared topic	Послание Главы государства Касым-Жомарта Токаева народу Казахстана 21 июля 2025 года	ru	political-issues-and-policy Bitrix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
xjmty.com ↗	55 match shared topic	推荐	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iica.int ↗	55 match shared topic	Home - es - IICA	es	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studytimes.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	学习时报网_依托于读书，着眼于问题	China zh	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imm-malang.org ↗	55 match shared topic	IMM Malang - Official Website IMM Malang	en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.