similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to programminglogic.com

Programminglogic alternatives & similar sites

Programming Logic | Algorithms, Computer Science and Programming Puzzles — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mydotprogramming.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	My Dot Programming - programming simplified!!	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daltonpearson.ca ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Dalton Pearson - Computer Programmer	Canada en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
memphiswebprogramming.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Memphis Web Programming \| A PLATFORM FOR MEMPHIS AREA WEB PROGRAMMERS	en	web-development Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kamiltczarnik.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kamil Czarnik — Computer Science Student & Software Engineer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5edice.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Web Programming 260	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
custom-coding.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Custom PHP Programming Victoria BC	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscc09.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CSCC09 - Programming on the Web @ UTSC	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
1keydata.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	1Keydata - Free Online Programming Tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brightwoodtechnologies.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Bright Wood Technologies – Programming courses, tutorials	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karunakarpatel.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Karunakar Patel: Navigating the landscape of programming knowledge	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learncybers.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Learn Cybers - Easy Programming & Frameworks Tutorials	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccp101.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CPP101 \| Programming is not about typing, it's about thinking.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deenntech.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Deen&Tech - Urdu Tech & Islamic Blog \| Programming & Islamic Education	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sideprogrammer.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Side Programmer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianewman.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Ian Newman \| Computer Engineering	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ariel.com.au ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ariel Computing Pty Ltd	Australia en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keithmfoster.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	The Reluctant Programmer -	en	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bramgiessen.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Bram van der Giessen – Web app developer – My personal blog about (mostly) programming and web-app development	en	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.