similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to profuisplus.com

Profuisplus alternatives & similar sites

TSELLC - ProfMFC MFC Software Libraries, Libraries to make computing easier — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
profclassfactory.com ↗	81 match 2 shared topics	TSELLC - ProfClassFactory Software Tools, Tools to make computing easier	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcoding.io ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	mCoding - Software consulting, contracting, and training with James Murphy	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minifx.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	MiniFx \| A set of minimalistic libraries for structuring JavaFx GUIs.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
florent-legall.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Software's kitchen	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brsoft.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Embedded Software Development \| Blue Rock Software \| United States	en	software-and-applications Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kayleechambers.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Kaylee Chambers \| Software Engineer Portfolio	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zsadigzade.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Ziya Sadigzade — Software Developer & CS Student	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fluxica.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Fluxica Peregrine - Automated In Vivo Software Testing	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cutk.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The C Utility Toolkit - C programming libraries	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharp-source.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Open Source Software in C#	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d-e-x.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Dex Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katex.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	KaTeX – The fastest math typesetting library for the web	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fiveysoftware.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Fivey Software	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mehdirhifar.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Mehdi Rhifar - Software Engineer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainwy.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Brainwy Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brising.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	brising.com – Compellingly Beautiful Software	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
geolib.co.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	GeoLib, a powerful, easy to use, Computational Geometry Library in C++, C# and Java	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbannikov.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Software Engineer's notes	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.