similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to professorpratcher.com

Professorpratcher alternatives & similar sites

Anthony Pratcher II, Ph. D. – In the end, the desert always wins… — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in History →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ourenduringlegacy.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Our Enduring Legacy: The Campaign to Preserve, Educate, and Inspire	en	history Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
herstoryproj.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	The HERstory Project \| women's history	en	history Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivacepanorama.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Vivace Panorama – Hindi Educational Portal	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dhowlett1692.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Dan Howlett - PhD Candidate researching disability in Early America	en	history WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baxterschoolhouse.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Old Baxter Schoolhouse — Baxter, Texas (Baxter Community Center Association)	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lahlebanon.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Lebanese Association for History (LAH)	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lakecityhistory.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Lake City History	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 10
heritagefairsns.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	NS Provincial Heritage Fairs Society	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddaytwins.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	D-Day Twins – The History of the Bowles Twins during WWII	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
lamphhs.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	LAMPHHS – Librarians, Archivists, and Museum Professionals in the History of the Health Sciences	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estellatran.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Periods in the Middle Ages	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcnairyhistoricalsociety.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	McNairy County Historical Society – Preserving the Past for the Future	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chinaheritage.net ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	China Heritage – The Wairarapa Academy for New Sinology	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
albanyindiancommissioners.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	The Albany Indian Commissioners – a path through their records	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alittlehistoryofthesikhs.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	A little History of the Sikhs – Sikh History on the streets of London	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pacificveterans.org ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Veterans day in the Pacific Northwest	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voicingthepast.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Voicing the Past	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliciagutierrezromine.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Alicia Gutierrez-Romine,Ph.D. – Historian and Author	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.