similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to productbuilders.app

Productbuilders alternatives & similar sites

Product Builders — Ship in public. Get heard. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
alekforgrowth.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Alek Darr — Product Manager & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
poproadmap.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	PopRoadmap — Simple public product roadmaps	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alansaldivar.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Saldivar Studio — Engineering Leadership & Product Development	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
constantin-works.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Constantin Works — Technical Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doublenines.co ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Double Nines - We Build Digital Products	Colombia en	technology-and-computing Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ethangorman.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ethan Gorman — Product Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mopofahl.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mo Pofahl — Product Analyst	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexfrison.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alex Frison — Software Engineer · Data Analyst · Builder	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vloom.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Geunmin Heo — Product Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2bunsllc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	2Buns LLC — Independent Product Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
koushikdasika.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Koushik Dasika — Hacker, Builder, Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethangunderson.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ethan Gunderson — Software Engineer, Author, Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
vizleo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Vizleo — Building What Matters	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
etesie.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Etesie — Own Your Product Foundation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vizelify.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Vizelify Charts — The Data Visualization Platform for Product Teams	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csmithfiles.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Caleb Smith \| Product Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inputly.co ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Inputly — a public feedback platform for anything	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xmemo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	0xMemo — Software Architect & Blockchain Builder	PE~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.