similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to prodotnetmemory.com

Prodotnetmemory alternatives & similar sites

Pro .NET Memory Management (2nd edition) — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
csalgorithm.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Implementation of algorithms in C#	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appbuilders.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	App Builders 2022 - Labs Edition	Switzerland en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivalaprogramacion.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Viva La Programación - The Revolutionary Code Movement	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcproto.info ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Java Edition protocol/Packets – Minecraft Wiki	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
langpy.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	LangPy - Python Localization and Educational Transpiler	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lahteenmaki.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Lähteenmäki.net \| jyri-matti lähteenmäki	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivekrathod.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	My coding journal \| Intended to be a place where I can capture coding and programming knowledge. It is mostly focused on .NET and C# with some work related to databases and security as well.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owen-lang.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Owen programming language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owenrudge.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	owenrudge.net - Welcome to owenrudge.net	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
koromix.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	koromix.dev \| Niels Martignène (Koromix)	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shubhamstha.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CS Student Portfolio	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pablogonzalez.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Pablo Gonzalez – Software Development, .Net, Agile, etc.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcohen.me ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	About Me - Mike Cohen	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexbites.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Hexcellent Expeditions and Byte-Sized Adventures \| Musings of what makes the computing machines tick	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
languagelineage.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Programming Language Lineage Graph \| What Languages Are Written In	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larsgjohnson.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Lars G. Johnson - functional programming using F#	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algorithmswithgo.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Algorithms with Go	en	programming-languages Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1prinft.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	1PRINTF	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.