similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to preyash.com

Preyash alternatives & similar sites

Preyash Shah — Product Manager & Builder — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
davidseal.ca ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	David Seal – Product Leader & Builder	Canada en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kasrafarivari.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Kasra Farivari — Senior Product Manager \| Personal Site & Blog	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
olegs.be ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Olegs Belousovs – Product Manager	Belgium en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamjasonwu.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jason Wu \| Technical Product Manager	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamucchash.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Iftekhar Ucchash Ahmed \| Product Engineer & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nadiaeldeib.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Nadia Eldeib - Founder & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sidacheng.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sida Cheng — Engineer, Product Builder, Founder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a7ma.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ahmad Gerashi \| DevOps Engineer & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meghnabhagwat.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Meghna Bhagwat · Product Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
misterd.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	misterD — Product Engineering Systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ifreqs.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	IFreqs \| Web3 Builder & Promoter	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2bunsllc.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	2Buns LLC — Independent Product Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
flavoursys.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Projective.io \| Production Asset Management	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brycegalen.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Bryce Galen — Products I wished existed	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brettwebb.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Brett Webb — Builder, Leader, Professional Vibe Coder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buache.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Buache — Senior Test Manager & QA Specialist in Lausanne, Switzerland	Switzerland~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silviadoomra.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Silvia Doomra — Technical Program Manager	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aayushchopra.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aayush Chopra — Builder & Writer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.