similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to poolbroker.com

Poolbroker alternatives & similar sites

poolbroker – gemeinsam günstiger handeln — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Financial Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
krohmeranalytics.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Krohmer Analytics – Gefährdungsanalyse	de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dakor.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	DakOR – VÖB-Service GmbH	Germany de	financial-industry TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dfpa.info ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Deutsche Finanz Presse Agentur – DFPA	de	financial-industry Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aretascapital.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Aretas – Gruppe, AG, Capital Management, Tax Management und US Tax	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amocad.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	amocad – Finanzmarktdaten-Management & Governance	Germany de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ledis.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	LeDIS – VÖB-Service GmbH	de	financial-industry TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crobase.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Thomas Müller — crobase GmbH	Germany de	financial-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bvtradingaquilasa.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BV Trading Aquila SA – AQUILA	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cubecastle.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	GS HOLDING BANC – Himmelsreich	Germany de	financial-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
czerwensky.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Czerwensky – Czerwensky-intern	Germany de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baumonitoring.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Baumonitoring – Digitalisiertes Risikomanagement für Banken und Investoren	de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
banktalent.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	BankTalent.ch – Discover. Connect. Excel.	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bernerbanken.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Ziel und Zweck – Verband Bernischer Banken	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bx-digital.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	BX Digital – Die Zukunft des Kapitalmarkts	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bxdigital.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	BX Digital – Die Zukunft des Kapitalmarkts	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d-hub.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	d-hub AG – Data Analytics & Client Research	Switzerland de	financial-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
directpresslive.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Directpresslive.com – Ihr Kurs-Reporter für Deutschland	de	financial-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aptic.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Aptic – Innovative fintech solutions for your growth	Germany de	financial-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.