similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ploughthroughruby.co.uk

Ploughthroughruby alternatives & similar sites

Plough => Ruby · Journey through ruby — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jamlang.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jam Programming Language - Jam	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisishowicode.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	this is how i code - my personal journey through creating with code	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jason-down.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	…I digress – My thoughts and experiences on my continuous-learning programming journey	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenhomann.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	See Jen Code? \| A blog about my journey through code school and (hopefully) beyond.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theta-lang.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Theta Language \| The Programming Language for Real-Time Data Analysis	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scalatutorials.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scala Tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
megha.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Java Through Examples	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1ma.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Write it simple - Simple programming short articles. Mostly ruby focused.	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesbetz.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Blog \| James Betz	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbucknam.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	John Bucknam’s Blog \| A programming blog.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thetechnojournals.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Techno Journals	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theswiftdev.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Articles about application development - The.Swift.Dev.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffhurchalla.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jeffrey Hurchalla \| Writing on Programming and C++	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markolenik.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mark Olenik \| Blog to document my journey in learning and building things.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meblum.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Meir Blumenfeld	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
martianov.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Maksim Martianov's engineering blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nums.co ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	nums.co \| Blog about programming.	Colombia en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jlumi.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Janne Lumijärvi’s Blog \| Just another programming blog.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.